The NOTE shown when an explicit login isn't provided is output on Stdout
instead of Stderr. This messes up the output of any commands when piping
them to a tool such as `yq`. Move this human readable information to
Stderr so it doesn't break any automated parsing.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/636
Co-authored-by: Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>
Co-committed-by: Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>
Add release asset management. This includes a series of subcommands under `tea release assets`:
- `tea release assets create <release-tag> <asset> [<asset>...]`: Upload one or more release attachments
- `tea release assets delete <release tag> <attachment name> [<attachment name>...]`: Delete one or more release attachments
- `tea release assets list <release tag>`: List Release Attachments
Co-authored-by: Dane Bouchie <dbouchie@iradimed.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/619
Co-authored-by: danebou <danebou@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: danebou <danebou@noreply.gitea.com>
Hello,
This is a proposal to support consulting / protecting / unprotecting branches for a specific repository.
I copied the existing code for "issues" report and adapted to branches. There is no change of legacy code so I do not expect any impact.
Supported commands are "list", "protect", "unprotect":
- "List" print the list of branches with some available fields from gitea.Branch type.
- "protect" creates a gitea.BranchProtection with some default parameters for some specific branches
- "unprotect" destroys gitea.BranchProtection for some specific branches
What is printed now could be enriched with additional information gitea datatypes already offer.
Could you please evaluate this proposal?
I would be happy to receive any comment or remark to take into account.
**tea branches unprotect** --login opsi --repo opensky main
**tea branches list** --login opsi --repo opensky --fields name,protected,user-can-merge,user-can-push,protection
[name protected user-can-merge user-can-push protection]
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
| NAME | PROTECTED | USER-CAN-MERGE | USER-CAN-PUSH | PROTECTION |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
| b_test | false | true | true | <None> |
| main | false | true | true | <None> |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
**tea branches protect** --login opsi --repo opensky main
**tea branches list** --login opsi --repo opensky --fields name,protected,user-can-merge,user-can-push,protection
[name protected user-can-merge user-can-push protection]
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
| NAME | PROTECTED | USER-CAN-MERGE | USER-CAN-PUSH | PROTECTION |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
| b_test | false | true | true | <None> |
| main | true | true | false | - enable-push: false |
| | | | | - approving: - |
| | | | | merging: - pushing: |
| | | | | |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
Following commands run OK:
> make test
> make fmt
> make lint
Co-authored-by: Leonard Vimond <leonard.vimond.e@thalesdigital.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/645
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: leonard.vimond <leonard.vimond@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: leonard.vimond <leonard.vimond@noreply.gitea.com>
commands now accept multiple arguments where it makes sense.
#### before
```
NAME:
tea issues close - Change state of an issue to 'closed'
USAGE:
tea issues close [command options] <issue index>
```
#### after
```
NAME:
tea issues close - Change state of one ore more issues to 'closed'
USAGE:
tea issues close [command options] <issue index> [<issue index>...]
```
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/512
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
This adds support for authentication using a SSH certificate and normal public keys when you've got an ssh-agent running that has this certificate or your public key loaded.
First question when creating a new login is to ask about the ssh certificates or public keys, when the answer is yes, we don't need to ask about tokens/usernames anymore.
Co-authored-by: Wim <wim@42.be>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/442
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Wim <42wim@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Wim <42wim@noreply.gitea.io>
Allows generating a plain text version of an issue (i.e. without colors and other terminal formatting) when storing stdout in a file.
```
tea issue --comments 1 > issue1.txt
```
`IsInteractive()` had to be moved to avoid a recursive import chain.
---
In the future, it would be nice to also respect the `--output` flag. This flag is currently designed for tabular output, but we could add more supported values like `markdown` `ansi`, `plain` to it
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/491
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This is a refactor of the code last touched in #458, making the control flow less backwards.
Additionally, this adds a preference `preferences.flag_defaults.remote` that allows to skip this heuristic and set a custom fixed default value for the `--remote` flag.
I'm not sure this is actually needed, I can revert that commit.
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/466
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Path-only URLs need an absolute reference to be resolved against for printing in markdown
Previously we resolved against the URL to the resource we were operating on (eg comment or issue URL).
The markdown renderer in the web UI resolves all such URLs relative to the repo base URL. This PR adopts this behaviour in tea, by trimming the URL to a repo base URL via regex.
This makes a custom patch to our markdown renderer `glamour` obsolete, which turned out to be an incorrect patch, meaning we can make use of upstream glamour again.
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/401
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Adds a new subcommand to clone repos:
```
tea clone --login try --depth 1 norwin/test
tea clone gitea/tea
tea clone noerw/tea # will set up `master` to track `upstream` remote
tea clone try.gitea.io/noerw/test # will automatically set --login
```
This is just a replacement for `git clone` with small benefits:
- [x] does not depend on `git`, as tea ships with go-git
- [x] spares you typing of URLs and autoselects https/ssh based on your login config
- [x] forked repos: set up origin + upstream remote
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/411
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
- Adds a new `Preferences` struct to the config, initially only containing `Editor: bool (default false)`.
This struct will be serialized to configs once there is a first tea induced change to the config (eg `tea login default <name>` or `tea login add`).
- Use external editor for all multiline prompts if preferred.
We already had a function for starting a texteditor for diff reviews; it does not really make sense to replace it with `survey.Editor`, as there is a big interface mismatch: survey expects strings as inputs, while our diff functions operate on files,
fixes#424
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/429
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
```
$ tea issue 230
#230 issue/pull details: show reactions (open)
@6543 created 2020-10-22 16:39
since reactions are utf8 now and most terminals too, we can display them nicely :)
https://gitea.com/api/v1/repos/gitea/tea/issues/230/reactions
--------
1x 🎉 | 1x 👀 | 1x | 1x 👍 | 1x 👎 | 1x 😆 | 1x 😕 | 1x ❤️
```
caveats:
- reactions are not returned as UTF8 (as was claimed in #230), so they need to be parsed. the library I use doesn't (and can't → ) support all reactions available in gitea
- currently only for issues, as reactions for comments mean an additional API request for each comment..
fixes#230
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/421
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
this is a partial fix to #378, making the command available outside of a local repo.
new behaviour:
- when run interactively without local repo context, the head repo prompt is not pre-populated
- when run with flags without local repo context, it will complain unless `--head` is specified
refactor:
- pass TeaContext down to task.CreatePull
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/393
Reviewed-by: Alexey 〒erentyev <axifive@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
fixes#380
note: It seems like it was expected that `SSHHost` only contains the host portion. So this may be breaking (although I don't believe many people used the feature like that with a custom ssh port). I can't think of a good reason to *not* specify the port in that field, including the port seems more intuitive
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/391
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
