## Problem
Tea commands fail when run from git worktrees with the error:
Remote repository required: Specify ID via --repo or execute from a
local git repo.
Even though the worktree is in a valid git repository with remotes
configured.
Additionally, `tea pr create` was missing context validation, showing
cryptic errors like `"path segment [0]
is empty"` instead of helpful messages.
## Root Cause
1. **Worktree issue**: go-git's `PlainOpenWithOptions` was not
configured to read the `commondir` file that
git worktrees use. This file points to the main repository's `.git`
directory where remotes are actually
stored (worktrees don't have their own remotes).
2. **PR create issue**: Missing `ctx.Ensure()` validation meant errors
weren't caught early with clear
messages.
## Solution
### 1. Enable worktree support (`modules/git/repo.go`)
```go
EnableDotGitCommonDir: true, // Enable commondir support for worktrees
This tells go-git to:
- Read the commondir file in .git/worktrees/<name>/commondir
- Follow the reference (typically ../..) to the main repository
- Load remotes from the main repo's config
2. Add context validation (cmd/pulls/create.go)
ctx.Ensure(context.CtxRequirement{
LocalRepo: true,
RemoteRepo: true,
})
Provides clear error messages and matches the pattern used in pr
checkout (fixed in commit 0970b945 from
2020).
3. Add test coverage (modules/git/repo_test.go)
- Creates a real git repository with a worktree
- Verifies that RepoFromPath() can open the worktree
- Confirms that Config() correctly reads remotes from main repo
Test Results
Without fix:
❌ FAIL: Should NOT be empty, but was map[]
With fix:
✅ PASS: TestRepoFromPath_Worktree (0.12s)
Manual test in worktree:
cd /path/to/worktree
tea pr create --title "test"
# Now works! ✅
Checklist
- Tested manually in a git worktree
- Added test case that fails without the fix
- All existing tests pass
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/850
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Martin <brandon@codedmart.com>
Co-committed-by: Brandon Martin <brandon@codedmart.com>
Since one of the last updates (I cannot tell you exactly which one, but likely 0.10 or 0.11), tea always asks me for my ssh passphrase without actually needing it. I do not have anything configured regarding SSH keys.
The passphrase is not even verified, you can enter anything there. But as this is quite annoying, I fixed this by moving the prompt to only be used when a ssh key/cert is configured.
Would be nice to get this in. Thanks!
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/844
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: qwerty287 <qwerty287@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: qwerty287 <qwerty287@posteo.de>
When running tea commands outside of a repository context, tea falls back to using the default login but always prompted for confirmation, even when a default was set. This fix only prompts when no default is configured.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/839
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ross Golder <ross@golder.org>
Co-committed-by: Ross Golder <ross@golder.org>
## Summary
This PR adds support for organization-level and global webhooks in the tea CLI tool.
## Changes Made
### Organization Webhooks
- Added `--org` flag to webhook commands to operate on organization-level webhooks
- Implemented full CRUD operations for org webhooks (create, list, update, delete)
- Extended TeaContext to support organization scope
### Global Webhooks
- Added `--global` flag with placeholder implementation
- Ready for when Gitea SDK adds global webhook API methods
### Technical Details
- Updated context handling to support org/global scopes
- Modified all webhook subcommands (create, list, update, delete)
- Maintained backward compatibility for repository webhooks
- Updated tests and documentation
## Usage Examples
```bash
# Repository webhooks (existing)
tea webhooks list
tea webhooks create https://example.com/hook --events push
# Organization webhooks (new)
tea webhooks list --org myorg
tea webhooks create https://example.com/hook --org myorg --events push,pull_request
# Global webhooks (future)
tea webhooks list --global
```
## Testing
- All existing tests pass
- Updated test expectations for new descriptions
- Manual testing of org webhook operations completed
Closes: webhook management feature request
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/798
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ross Golder <ross@golder.org>
Co-committed-by: Ross Golder <ross@golder.org>
This PR adds validation for the `--object-format` flag in the `repo create` command. The flag now accepts only `sha1` or `sha256` as valid values, and returns an error for any other value.
Changes:
- Added validation in `runRepoCreate` to check for valid object format values
- Added unit tests to verify the validation logic
- Fixed the field name from `ObjectFormat` to `ObjectFormatName` to match the SDK
The changes ensure that users get clear error messages when using invalid object format values, improving the user experience.
Fix#727Fix#660Fix#767
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/741
Reviewed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@noreply.gitea.com>
When users login gitea on a headless server via ssh, xdg-open might not be installed on that machine. So tea may fail to open URL itself. In this case, users can use the other machine to open the URL for authentication.
Github CLI act like this, too.
Signed-off-by: Chen Linxuan <me@black-desk.cn>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/794
Reviewed-by: blumia <blumia@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: Chen Linxuan <me@black-desk.cn>
Co-committed-by: Chen Linxuan <me@black-desk.cn>
The SSH host matching logic in contextFromLocalRepo only compared
exact host:port combinations. This failed for SSH remotes using
non-standard ports because the login SSH host configuration typically
stores just the hostname without the port.
This change allows matching both the full host:port string and the
hostname-only version against the configured SSH host, enabling
tea to work with SSH remotes on non-standard ports.
Fixes issue where commands requiring RemoteRepo failed with
'Remote repository required' error when using SSH on custom ports.
Signed-off-by: JD Daniels <jd@danielsdynamic.ca>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/761
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JD Daniels <jd@danielsdynamic.ca>
Co-committed-by: JD Daniels <jd@danielsdynamic.ca>
The NOTE shown when an explicit login isn't provided is output on Stdout
instead of Stderr. This messes up the output of any commands when piping
them to a tool such as `yq`. Move this human readable information to
Stderr so it doesn't break any automated parsing.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/636
Co-authored-by: Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>
Co-committed-by: Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>
Add release asset management. This includes a series of subcommands under `tea release assets`:
- `tea release assets create <release-tag> <asset> [<asset>...]`: Upload one or more release attachments
- `tea release assets delete <release tag> <attachment name> [<attachment name>...]`: Delete one or more release attachments
- `tea release assets list <release tag>`: List Release Attachments
Co-authored-by: Dane Bouchie <dbouchie@iradimed.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/619
Co-authored-by: danebou <danebou@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: danebou <danebou@noreply.gitea.com>
Hello,
This is a proposal to support consulting / protecting / unprotecting branches for a specific repository.
I copied the existing code for "issues" report and adapted to branches. There is no change of legacy code so I do not expect any impact.
Supported commands are "list", "protect", "unprotect":
- "List" print the list of branches with some available fields from gitea.Branch type.
- "protect" creates a gitea.BranchProtection with some default parameters for some specific branches
- "unprotect" destroys gitea.BranchProtection for some specific branches
What is printed now could be enriched with additional information gitea datatypes already offer.
Could you please evaluate this proposal?
I would be happy to receive any comment or remark to take into account.
**tea branches unprotect** --login opsi --repo opensky main
**tea branches list** --login opsi --repo opensky --fields name,protected,user-can-merge,user-can-push,protection
[name protected user-can-merge user-can-push protection]
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
| NAME | PROTECTED | USER-CAN-MERGE | USER-CAN-PUSH | PROTECTION |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
| b_test | false | true | true | <None> |
| main | false | true | true | <None> |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
**tea branches protect** --login opsi --repo opensky main
**tea branches list** --login opsi --repo opensky --fields name,protected,user-can-merge,user-can-push,protection
[name protected user-can-merge user-can-push protection]
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
| NAME | PROTECTED | USER-CAN-MERGE | USER-CAN-PUSH | PROTECTION |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
| b_test | false | true | true | <None> |
| main | true | true | false | - enable-push: false |
| | | | | - approving: - |
| | | | | merging: - pushing: |
| | | | | |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
Following commands run OK:
> make test
> make fmt
> make lint
Co-authored-by: Leonard Vimond <leonard.vimond.e@thalesdigital.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/645
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: leonard.vimond <leonard.vimond@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: leonard.vimond <leonard.vimond@noreply.gitea.com>
