mirror of
https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh.git
synced 2025-09-02 01:58:28 +02:00
Polish STARTTLS rating output
Moved the sentence ~i "A grade better than T would lead to a false sense of security" to the documentation. No reason for excuses in the output. ;-) Explanation fits better in the doc. See also #1657
This commit is contained in:
@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ This program has a near\-complete implementation of SSL Labs\'s \'SSL Server Rat
|
||||
This is \fInot\fR a 100% reimplementation of the SSL Lab\'s SSL Server Test \fIhttps://www\.ssllabs\.com/ssltest/analyze\.html\fR, but an implementation of the above rating specification, slight discrepancies may occur\. Please note that for now we stick to the SSL Labs rating as good as possible\. We are not responsible for their rating\. Before filing issues please inspect their Rating Guide\.
|
||||
.
|
||||
.P
|
||||
Disclaimer: Having a good grade is \fBNOT\fR necessarily equal to having good security! Don\'t start a competition for the best grade, at least not without monitoring the client handshakes and not without adding a portion of good sense to it\.
|
||||
Disclaimer: Having a good grade is \fBNOT\fR necessarily equal to having good security! Don\'t start a competition for the best grade, at least not without monitoring the client handshakes and not without adding a portion of good sense to it\. Please note STARTTLS always results in a grade cap to T\. Anything else would lead to a false sense of security \- at least until we test for DANE or MTA-STS\.
|
||||
.
|
||||
.P
|
||||
As of writing, these checks are missing: * GOLDENDOODLE \- should be graded \fBF\fR if vulnerable * Insecure renegotiation \- should be graded \fBF\fR if vulnerable * Padding oracle in AES\-NI CBC MAC check (CVE\-2016\-2107) \- should be graded \fBF\fR if vulnerable * Sleeping POODLE \- should be graded \fBF\fR if vulnerable * Zero Length Padding Oracle (CVE\-2019\-1559) \- should be graded \fBF\fR if vulnerable * Zombie POODLE \- should be graded \fBF\fR if vulnerable * All remaining old Symantec PKI certificates are distrusted \- should be graded \fBT\fR * Symantec certificates issued before June 2016 are distrusted \- should be graded \fBT\fR * ! A reading of DH params \- should give correct points in \fBset_key_str_score()\fR * Anonymous key exchange \- should give \fB0\fR points in \fBset_key_str_score()\fR * Exportable key exchange \- should give \fB40\fR points in \fBset_key_str_score()\fR * Weak key (Debian OpenSSL Flaw) \- should give \fB0\fR points in \fBset_key_str_score()\fR
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user