While it seems that almost all certificates include a subjectAltName extension, need to allow for the possibility that the two certificates being compared don't have subjectAltName extensions.
Since some OpenSSL binaries, namely Gentoo’s, don’t support bracketed
IPv6 addresses but unbracketed ones, specified as the -connect option,
the UNBRACKETED_IPV6 environment variable can be set to true for
disabling the automatic addition of brackets around IPv6 addresses on
such platforms.
While standard OpenSSL requires the literal IPv6 address enclosed
in [brackets], standard DNS lookup tools don’t support the additional
characters. Before making reverse PTR lookups, these brackets have to
be removed from the IPv6 addresses.
When run_rc4() is run with the "--show-each" option, but without the "--wide" option, a list of all RC4 ciphers is printed, without any distinction between those that are supported by the server and those that are not. This is the same issue I noted in #332 for run_pfs().
In run_pfs(), the displayed output was corrected, but all ciphers were still being added to $pfs_ciphers, so the list of supported PFS ciphers sent to fileout() was incorrect.
This PR fixes both issues.
When certificate_info() is trying to determine what type of public key the server has so that it can determine whether the key size is acceptable, it sometimes looks at $cert_sig_algo rather than $cert_key_algo. This PR fixes that and also adds support for DSA public keys.
The dec2hex() was actually converting from hex to decimal. Since it was only being used in one place, and wasn't really needed there, I just deleted it.
Revised parse_tls_serverhello() to more carefully check the response for errors, and to provide for more flexibility (e.g., if handshake messages are split across multiple fragments).
The new test in PR #346 sends a TLSv1.4 ClientHello, so socksend_tls_clienthello() needs to include the signature algorithms extension if $tls_low_byte >= 3 rather than only if it is equal to 3.
Changed to only include the signature algorithms extension for TLSv1.2, since RFC 5246 says:
Note: this extension is not meaningful for TLS versions prior to 1.2.
Clients MUST NOT offer it if they are offering prior versions.
However, even if clients do offer it, the rules specified in [TLSEXT]
require servers to ignore extensions they do not understand.
Inclusion of the extension for TLS 1.1 didn't seem to cause any harm, but it seems better to follow the RFC and not include it for TLSv1.0 or TLSv1.1.
RFC 7685 notes that there is at least one TLS implementation that hangs if the client sends a ClientHello with a TLSCiphertext.length between 256 and 511 bytes, and so the padding extension was defined in order to get around this bug. (OpenSSL s_client includes this extension when the -bugs option is used.) So, I changed socksend_tls_clienthello() to include the padding extension if the CLientHello would have a length between 256 and 511 bytes, making the padding extension just large enough to make the ClientHello 512 bytes.
I also fixed a typo (a missing "0x") in the check for whether any ECC ciphers are included in the Client Hello.
This PR adds the signature algorithms, heartbeat, session ticket, and next protocol extensions to the client hello message created by socksend_tls_clienthello() for TLS 1.0 and above. It also adds the supported elliptic curves and ec points format extensions if the client hello message includes any ECC cipher suites.
I tested this version against several servers with $EXPERIMENTAL set to true and get the same results as with the current code with $EXPERIMENTAL set to false.
The last line of neat_list currently uses $HEXC as the parameter to show_rfc_style(), but it should use $hexcode. At the moment using $HEXC instead of $hexcode makes no difference, since hexcode="$1" and in all calls to neat_list() the first parameter is $HEXC. However, this bug could create problems in the future since neat_list() will misbehave if the value of the first parameter (hexcode) isn't the same as $HEXC.
This PR makes basically the same changes to run_cipher_per_proto() as I previously made to run_allciphers(). The main difference is that in this function, round 0 consists of a single call to "$OPENSSL s_client" with "-cipher" including all of the locally supported ciphers. The reason for the difference is that in run_allciphers() its saves time to assume the server supports at least one cipher suite. In the case of run_cipher_per_proto(), however, it is likely that the server will not support some protocols at all, so its usually faster to start with a single call to "$OPENSSL s_client" that tests whether the server supports the protocol at all.
David Cooper
Dirk
typingArtist