The commit updates the test for the "Visibility Information" certificate extension used in the ETSI Enterprise Transport Security protocol.
The main change is to support OpenSSL 3.0.0, which prints more information about subject alternative names that are encoded as otherName. For otherName types for the OpenSSL has no information, it prints "otherName: <OID>::<unsupported>" rather than just "otherName: <unsupported>". So, testssl.sh needs to account for the possibility that the OID for the visibility information certificate extension will be printed.
This commit also updates the reference for this extension and changes the name of the function from etsi_etls_visibility_info() to etls_ets_visibility_info() since the name of the protocol was changed from Enterprise TLS (eTLS) to Enterprise Transport Security (ETS).
This commit does not change the output to the terminal or to JSON/CSV, even though those outputs use the previous name of eTLS rather than ETS.
The ALPN GREASE test was written based on draft-ietf-tls-grease-01, which reserved all ALPN identifiers beginning with the prefix "ignore/". This commit changes the test to align with RFC 8701, which instead reserves {0x0A,0x0A}, {0x1A,0x1A}, ..., {0xFA,0xFA}.
Improved:
* readability of my old code
* readability of debugging statements
* honor $SNEAKY for SMTP greeting
* hook (arg2 to starttls_smtp_dialog() ), if we plan to add / replace SMTP greeting at some point
This is a legacy warning and seems only needed in a very few cases
whereas in other few cases we don't issue such warnings. So to be
consistent it's right to remove this message as it confuses users
unnecessarily,
It'll appear in debug mode though.
See https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh/issues/1119#issuecomment-656271849
As there as suggestions to check intermediate certificates for things such as expiration date, this commit saves the text versions of each of the intermediate certificates so that they are available to extract additional information.
This commit checks whether any intermediate certificates provided by the server include an extended key usage extension that asserts the OCSP Signing key purpose.
This commit replaces #1680, which checks for such certificates by comparing the server's intermediate certificates against a fixed list of known bad certificates.
* open: generation of intermediate certificate files. We do that
at several places. But for some reasons I do not understand currently
we remove those files.
* we don't name the offending certificate
run_cipherlists() checks for support for different groups of ciphers, but does not indicate which ciphers in each group are supported. So, for example, if the JSON file indicates that there is a problem with severity level "HIGH" because the "LOW" ciphers are available, there is no clear indication of which of these ciphers are supported by the server.
If run_server_preference() is run with "--color 3", then there will be a visual indication (via color) of the ciphers the server supports that are considered bad, but this information does not appear in the JSON (or CSV) output. The JSON (or CSV) output will include information about every cipher that is supported, but the severity level is always "INFO".
This commit addresses this problem by changing the fileout() calls in ciphers_by_strength() and cipher_pref_check() that output each supported cipher individually so that the "severity" argument is an indication of the quality of the cipher. With this, information about which bad ciphers are supported can easily be found in the JSON/CSV output.
When testssl.sh is called with an unknown option it prints something like:
0: unrecognized option "--option"
It should be printing the name of the program rather than "0". This commit fixes that.
This commit separates pr_cipher_quality() into two functions, one that returns the quality of a cipher as a numeric rating (get_cipher_quality()) and one that prints a cipher based on its quality (pr_cipher_quality()). This separation allows get_cipher_quality() to be used to determine how good a cipher is without having to print anything. Having this ability would be helpful in implementing the changes suggested in #1311.
Moved the sentence ~i "A grade better than T would lead to a false sense of security"
to the documentation. No reason for excuses in the output. ;-) Explanation fits
better in the doc.
See also #1657
Dirk Wetter
David Cooper
a1346054
Magnus Larsen
Christoph Settgast