This PR attempts to address #631. It allows four choices for the `--mapping` option. "openssl" (default), "rfc", "no-openssl", and "no-rfc".
* "openssl" is the current default
* "no-rfc" shows only the OpenSSL names (just as it currently does)
* "rfc" shows the RFC name rather than the OpenSSL name for things that are not in wide now (just as it currently does). But now, in wide mode, it shows the RFC name first (further to the left) and the OpenSSL name second.
* "rfc-only" shows only the RFC name.
If the `--mapping` option is not provided, this is the same as "openssl". If the "cipher-mapping.txt" file cannot be found, then testssl.sh runs as if "no-rfc" had been requested.
It seems that the head command on OS X does not accept a negative number as a value for the "-n" parameter. This PR provides an alternative method for removing the "generator: " line without using "head."
Some sites have a long list of IP addresses and some IP addresses have a long list of DNS names that map to them.
This PR changes `display_rdns_etc()` to use `out_row_aligned_max_width()` to print the other IP addresses in `$IP46ADDRs` and to print `$rDNS`.
RFC 7633 introduces the TLS Features certificate extension, which contains "Features:
> The object member "Features" is a sequence of TLS extension identifiers (features, in this specification's terminology) as specified in the IANA Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions registry. If these features are requested by the client in its ClientHello message, then the server MUST return a ServerHello message that satisfies this request.
The main purpose of this certificate extension is to implement "must staple." If the extension is present in a TLS server's certificate and it includes status_request, then the server MUST include a stapled OCSP response if the client requests one. (The same applies for the status_request_v2 extension.)
This PR adds a check to `certificate_info()` of whether the server supports must staple (i.e., whether its certificate includes a TLS Features extension with "status_request"). It also changes the output for "OCSP stapling" in the case that the server did not staple an OCSP response. It indicates that:
* it is a critical issue if the certificate specifies "must staple"
* it is a low severity issue if the certificate does not specify "must staple," but the certificate does include an OCSP URI.
* it is not an issue at all if the certificate does not specify "must staple" and certificate does not include an OCSP URI.
`run_server_preference()` prints out the server's Negotiated cipher in a different color depending on the quality of the cipher. However, there is a "FIXME" since CBC ciphers are supposed to be flagged, but it is not easy to identity all CBC ciphers from their OpenSSL names.
This PR partially addresses this. It creates a separate function for printing a cipher based on its quality. Whenever possible it determines the quality of the cipher based on the RFC name. However, if it is provided an OpenSSL name and no cipher-mapping.txt file is available, it will follow the current (imperfect) logic for determining the cipher's quality.
The function also returns a value that indicates the quality of the cipher provided, with higher numbers indicating better ciphers. This return value is used by `run_server_preference()` to determine how to populate the "severity" field when calling `fileout()`.
In the case that `tls_sockets()` is being used and the server incorrectly fails the connection rather than downgrading, testssl.sh is printing "not offered" on one line and then the error message on the next line, but all the text should appear on one line (as it does when testing TLS 1 and TLS 1.1).
Since the test for TLS 1.2 in `run_protocols()` now uses `tls_sockets()` whenever `$ssl_native` is `true` (i.e., there is no longer a requirement for `$EXPERIMENTAL` to be true as well), the `$EXPERIMENTAL` flag should no longer be checked if the return value is 1.
Rearrange code so that in the case of just a single test, `parse_hn_port()` is not called earlier than it was previously unless it needs to be called in order to create the HTML file name.
Doing this ensures that the banner is displayed even if the `$URI` cannot be parsed (except in the case that the `$URI` needs to be parsed in order to create a file name) and that any error messages created by `parse_hn_port()` will be included in the HTML, if possible.
David Cooper
Dirk Wetter
Konstantin Shalygin