testssl.sh/t
Dirk 191c69fbdd Minor probe for STARTTLS xmpp-server
... don't know whether this gets through -- depends on the
version openssl used (1.0.2 doesn't have that)
2020-05-01 18:39:36 +02:00
..
00_testssl_help.t Move debugging remainders detection to t/00_testssl_help.t 2020-01-22 21:04:23 +01:00
01_testssl_banner.t removed comment 2020-01-18 21:45:32 +01:00
02_clientsim_txt_parsable.t Output adjustments closer to a more common format 2020-01-14 18:44:11 +01:00
05_ca_hashes_up_to_date.t Output adjustments closer to a more common format 2020-01-14 18:44:11 +01:00
07_isJSON_valid.t add unlink / start with a clean state 2020-01-18 21:47:44 +01:00
08_isHTML_valid.t Hopefully make Travis shut up now 2020-01-22 11:30:21 +01:00
09_isJSON_severitylevel_valid.t add unlink / start with a clean state 2020-01-18 21:47:44 +01:00
20_baseline_ipv4_http.t Rename PFS/perfect forward secrecy to FS/forward secrecy 2020-04-14 15:53:05 +02:00
21_baseline_ipv6_http.t.DISABLED Rename PFS/perfect forward secrecy to FS/forward secrecy 2020-04-14 15:53:05 +02:00
23_client_simulation.t Update to newest template 2019-05-06 11:20:28 +02:00
25_baseline_starttls.t Minor probe for STARTTLS xmpp-server 2020-05-01 18:39:36 +02:00
51_badssl.com.t Rename file according to new scheme 2019-05-05 13:44:02 +02:00
59_hpkp.t.tmpDISABLED Rename file according to new scheme 2019-05-05 13:44:02 +02:00
Readme.md Redefine numbering scheme 2020-01-13 23:00:10 +01:00

Naming scheme

  • 00-05: Does the bare testssl.sh work at all?
  • 06-09: Does the reporting work at all?
  • 20-39: Do scans work fine (client side)?
  • 50-69: Are the results what I expect (server side)?

Please help to write Travis/CI tests! Documentation can be found here. You can consult the existing code here. Feel free to use 20_baseline_ipv4_http.t or 23_client_simulation.t as a template.