whatever we thought it may have done in the past, it doesn't do that now as far as we know. And it's not an issue since we allow extension update-CHECKs anyway.
regardless of this pref setting: the permissions.sqlite file will still be abused to store a flag for this for every single site you connect to (as third party?) - fun.
* clean up "Firefox Data Collection & Use"
- telemetry prefs to 330's
- Firefox Data Collection & Use prefs to 340's (but leave crash reports in 350s)
- move `app.shield.optoutstudies.enabled` to 330's - this is an internal pref which controls if you get the system addon
- make notes that `datareporting.healthreport.uploadEnabled` controls studies and ext recommendations
- split crash reports better to reflex the UI setting
`browser.urlbar.maxHistoricalSearchSuggestions` is default 0 is FF60 thru to FF66. It is also default 0 in ESR60.1 thru 60.5. (at least on Windows)
IDK if this has ever been used, maybe android, in which case it's probably useful?
The location bar dropdown cannot be disabled via prefs except with css, in which case the whole thing is hidden regardless of he above prefs. So there is no point in making any of them active. This is also in line with what we can achieve with relaxed and hardened tags / sticky issues - that is we can find a better balance, Shoulder surfers is a low risk, not even Tor Browser disables this stuff. People need to take responsibility and/or use common sense. Sure, we can leave em in for users to know about and enable if they want. End of story.
userChrome.css code is
```css
/* locationbar dropdown FF65+ */
#PopupAutoCompleteRichResult {display: none!important;}
```
might as well add it: needs t be taken into consideration when looking at the whole http2 thing. Will be interesting to see what Tor Browser does with it in ESR68
it's too hard to follow AS changes, and work out if disabling showing items (basic toggling of show/hide sections etc) actually stops downloading a localized local copy etc. For items we actually want to block, let the endpoint slaughter begin.
let's just coverage-our-ass on this one
While I don't mind telemetry (development needs meaningful feedback to better the product), and I trust the data is not PII, and/or anonymized into buckets etc (you can check this you know), and I understand this one needs to be outside the Telemetry pref in order to gather the one-time ping ... and I trust Mozilla's motives ... I'm starting to get a little annoyed at the non-stop incessant increasing telemetry bullshittery and ass-fuckery around sending data home, and the lengths some Mozilla devs will go to, to hide this info (hidden prefs, access denied tickets to hide discussion of what should be public, and even **not even adhering to their own documentation**).
I will also be killing as many Activity Stream endpoints as well - as long as they are in line with our js - pocket, snippets, onboarding etc. And I will add those from personal as inactive for end-users - eg cfr
FYI, the https://www.privacytools.io/webrtc.html test in our wiki is 404, so I gave it a strikethru and added this one. This is also handy for 2001, but do we need to double up on it? We're only disabling WebRTC because of IP leaks, so I don't see the point in testing if WebRTC is disabled.
Session Restore cannot be disabled in Normal mode, it is also used internally. FYI: PB Mode does not use Session Restore. The description is still not 100%, as it refers to what is restored, not what is kept in the recovery.jsonlz4 (at least for tabs)
flipped true in FF54: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1026804 but unsure when the pref itself was introduced. note: other timing prefs were always in 2400's see 4602: [2411] disable resource/navigation timing / 4603: [2412] disable timing attacks
it has zero to do with privacy etc, and in fact most users will only ever encounter it once (and check the box) when they first go to about:config, so it's not even useful as an override or a new profile IMO. This removes one of three numbers that don't have a section
TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are still secure. Sure, later versions are more secure, but 98% of the web is already upgraded - less than 2% of sites use < v1.2. So it's not very likely you would come across a site that requires it, but if you did, what's the point in breaking it. Mozilla and Chrome already have plans to deprecate TLS 1.0 & 1.1, and force that last 2% of sites.
TLS settings can be FP'ed without JS. By sticking with the defaults, I do not see any security issues, but an increase in potential anti-FPing. TBH, the chances of either (i.e being FP'ed with TLS as a entropy point, or being compromised due to TLS<1.2) are slim to non anyway.
Any arguments, please see @earthlng
