Hostnames can contain a trailing dot (and sometimes they should).
If they are supplied to testssl.sh however they will be also interpreted
as a URL PATH when the servive is HTTP.
This commit fixes that.
This switch had no effect. There was probably a regression
problem as it worked before.
Besides fixing that the large case statement in parse_cmd_line()
was simplified, in a sense that banner and help functions were
moved to a separate case statement.
This PR adds support for post-handshake messages when using sockets with TLS 1.3 connections. If a TLS 1.3 connection is established and the connection is to remain open after tls_sockets() finishes, then after the client's Finished message is sent the master secret and the application traffic keys are computed. This PR also adds two new functions to send and receive application data over a TLS 1.3 connection.
This PR also includes two proofs-of-concept for the use of the new functions. receive_app_data() is called immediately after the client's Finished message is sent. Some server's will send new session tickets immediately after the handshake is complete. If they do, then the code will decrypt and parse the session ticket messages.
This PR also modifies service_detection() to try using sockets if the server only supports TLS 1.3 and $OPENSSL does not support TLS 1.3. After the handshake is complete, this code sends an HTTP GET request and reads the response. The code is fairly slow and it doesn't always work. However, since it is only used in cases in which $OPENSSL cannot work, it can't hurt to try using sockets.
Due to a bug, the shellcheck program will complain if a variable is defined as an array but is later used as an ordinary string, even if the two uses are locally defined variables in different contexts. The error message is:
SC2178: Variable was used as an array but is now assigned a string.
While the warnings are not highlighting any actual problems in testssl.sh, this PR gets rid of the warnings by renaming a few variables.
The implementation of AES-GCM in #1473 is much slower than the original version, even when the authentication tag is not being computed. This PR modifies the code in gcm() in order to significantly speed up the encryption/decryption time (when authentication tags are not being computed).
This PR adds processing of the Finished messages in TLS 1.3 handshakes. It also addresses some shellcheck issues.
If in debug mode, the HMAC of the transcript hash of the handshake context ($msg_transcript) is computed and compared against the Finished message sent by the server.
If the full server response is parsed and the connection with the server is not to be closed when tls_sockets() completes, then the TLS 1.3 handshake is completed by creating the client Finished message and sending it to the server.
This PR reorganizes the code for deriving TLS 1.3 symmetric keys in order to facilitate implementing the full key schedule. For example, rather than having a single function to derive the handshake traffic keys, this PR creates one function to derive the handshake secret and a separate function to derive the handshake traffic keys. The second function has been generalized so that it can derive either client or server traffic keys. Separating into two functions also makes the handshake_secret available for later use to derive the master secret and then the application traffic secrets and the application traffic keys.
This PR also changes where there message transcript is created, a message transcript will also be needed to derive the application traffic secrets. This PR includes the code to add the messages to the initial message transcript that will be needed for the input to the application traffic secret derivation function.
RFC 8446 specifies cipher suites that use three symmetric encryption algorithms, all of which are Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD) algorithms. In each of these algorithms when data is encryption an authentication tag is created, which allows the recipient to verify that the data has not been modified. The authentication may also cover some additional data that was not encrypted.
The current implementations of these algorithms in testssl.sh decrypt the ciphertext, but do not check that the authentication tag is correct (which involves the recipient computing the correct tag for the received data and then comparing it to the provided tag). While testssl.sh can get away with not checking authentication tags when receiving data, the ability to compute authentication tags is needed in order to send encrypted data as TLS servers would reject any encrypted data that did not have a correct authentication tag. Being able to send encrypted data is necessary to be able to complete the TLS 1.3 handshake.
This PR replaces the current implementations of the symmetric encryption algorithms with full implementations of each of the algorithms. These full implementations include the ability to encrypt data for sending, and can also verify the authentication tag when decrypting data. Since the Bash implementations of these algorithms is very slow, the decryption code is designed to only compute and check authentication tags in debug mode.
While the implementation of the code to compute authentication tags for AES-CCM was based on NIST Special Publication 800-38C, I was not able to implement the code for AES-GCM or Poly1305 from their specifications (NIST Special Publication 800-38D and RFC 8439, respectively). So, I would very much like to thank the implementers of https://github.com/mko-x/SharedAES-GCM and https://github.com/floodyberry/poly1305-donna. The implementations of AES-GCM and Poly1305 in the PR were developed by translating the C code in https://github.com/mko-x/SharedAES-GCM and https://github.com/floodyberry/poly1305-donna into Bash. I don't understand what that code is doing, but it seems to work. :-)
I have only tested this code on a computer with a 64-bit operating system. While I have not tested it, I believe that the decryption code will work with 32-bit integers if not in debug mode (i.e., if not trying to compute the authentication tags). I also believe that the AES-CCM code for computing authentication tags will work with 32-bit integers. However, AES-GCM and Poly1305 code for computing authentication tags will definitely only work on systems that have 64-bit integers. So, on systems that do not have 64-bit integers, encryption will not work for AES-GCM or ChaCha20-Poly1305, and decryption will not work for these algorithms if in debug mode.
For a fresh start it seemed a good idea to cleanup
the order of functions and some variables so that
those with the same functionality are somewhat grouped.
Some of the functions have now a header and a foooter
to make it easier to spot and use then. Also for added future
functions the hope is that they will be put where they better
fit
This PR simplifies the code for determining which draft version of TLS 1.3 a server is offering by making use of a simple regular expression and $BASH_REMATCH rather than looping through every possible draft version.
PR #1463 changed run_ssl_poodle() to only run the test if it is known that the server supports SSLv3. However, support for SSLv3 may be unknown at the time run_ssl_poodle() is run (e.g., if the server supports TLS 1 and SSLv3, and run_ssl_poodle() is the first test performed). So, run_ssl_poodle() should perform testing unless it is known that SSLv3 is not supported.