This PR fixes#1159. If tls_sockets() connects to a server using TLSv1.3, it cannot be assumed that the server's certificate is available, as testssl.sh may not have been able to decrypt the server's response. This can happen, for example, if X25519 was used for the key exchange and `$OPENSSL` does not support X25519.
If the connection was successful, but the certificate could not be obtained, then this PR tries again using `$OPENSSL`. However, since `$OPENSSL` does not support TLSv1.3, this will only work if the server supports TLSv1.2 or earlier.
This commit addresses #179 and implements NNTP via STARTTLS. I did
a few tests and it did work so far.
However the binary support needs to be done. I backported in my
fork of @PeterMosmans tree the section from OpenSSL 1.1.1 -- but
it didn't work, see https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/7722.
I just tried to patch it as I suggested and it worked then. My
patch is pushed soon after to https://github.com/drwetter/openssl-1.0.2.bad,
however I'll better wait for the official OPenSSL 1.1.1 patch.
This commit finalizes #1139. It displays the DH groups
in both run_logjam() and run_pfs() in a simlilar manner
(except the FFDHE groups).
A common small function pr_dh() was introduced which prints
out the dh group and in round brackets colored DH bits.
This commit finally fixes#547 and makes XMPP handshakes at least
as fast as the other STARTTLS handshakes.
It utilizes dd to read from the file descriptor. In all tests
I ran so far it didn't cause any problems. There's a potential
problem though that dd might block.
This PR fixes#924 and does some foundation for #547. It's a
somewhat preliminary push of code and further work for #547 is required.
XMPP is now similar programmed as other STARTTLS handshakes with the exception
that it is not line based but stream based. That is still the catch here and
needs to be addressed: STARTTLS protocols like IMAP + SMTP use
starttls_full_read() which reads lines until the line is completely received or
the timeout was encountered.
The new function ``starttls_io()`` however does a wait (fixed value: 1 second)
as there's no lf or terminator.
The XMPP STARTTLS handshakes are now the same as in OpenSSL.
There are redundant functions in this code which will be removed later.
Also at some places a hint for lmtp was missing which was added.
The cipher suites names in the RFCs stem (mostly) from IANA, see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-parameters-4
This PR corrects that in places visible to the user. For backwards
compatibility the cmd line switches still work as before, but there's
a preference to IANA. The RFC naming is labeled as to be retired
in the future.
SSLabs API only added one newer version of Chrome (70) and one newer version
of Firefox (62).
Thus the wishlist gets longer (c15e0425dc).
Missing is Android 8 and 9, OpenSSL 1.1.1, Safari on OSX 11 and 12. Java 10
and 11.
Fix#1104
In addition to 7d36ba9a2e which
added new SSLv2 ciphers to the ciphers file this commit adds those
ciphers also to those functions where needed.
Also it does some housekeeping. [[ doesn't require strings on
the right hand side to be quoted, see bash hackers wiki.
PR #1114 brought #1139 a good step forward. This commit adds
a few tweaks to it:
* the groups in run_pfs() are now also italic, except FFDHE groups
* renaming FF groups to DH groups to provide consistency with the
remainder of testssl.sh
* JSON identifier was renamed from DHE_groups to DH_GROUPS
Open points:
* in run_logjam() there's no warning at all regarding e.g. dh512.badssl.com.
Reading the Logjam paper in section 3.5., first couple of paragraphs we
should warn at least against 512 bits here too.
* how do we treat/label 768 bit and 1024 bit in run_logjam() which comes from
unknown groups? Looks like the paper only was concerned about precompuation.
* In run_logjam() is the bit length not colored but in run_pfs() it is.
* Notation: when do we label FF groups / DH parameter ephemeral?
* Code in run_pfs() and run_logjam() can be merged more.
run_logjam() is only related to TLSv1.2 and earlier ciphers. So, run_pfs() should only update $DH_GROUP_OFFERED if a DH group was found using a non-TLSv1.3 cipher.
On the other side, if run_logjam() happened to have been run first, and it found an ffdhe cipher, then there is no need for run_pfs() to test for it.
In run_pfs(), when information about the finite field groups offered is printed, the color used is based on the length of the key. This information should also be conveyed to fileout() in the severity parameter.
For cipher suites that use ephemeral DH groups, run_pfs() currently only displays information about the group(s) used if the server complies with RFC 7919. In the case of TLSv1.3 this is appropriate, since server can only use the values from this RFC and only if they are offered by the client in the supported_groups extension.
For TLSv1.2 and earlier, however, servers are free to use whatever DH group they want, but run_pfs() only provides information about the group the server uses if the server complies with RFC 7919. (The information is, however, provided by run_logjam()). However, so far no servers comply with RFC 7919's requirement to refuse to negotiate a TLS_DHE cipher if the supported groups extension is present, included DH groups, but none that are supported by the server. There is also reason to believe that this will not change: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg26378.html.
So, this PR proposes to change the way that run_pfs() searches for DH groups for TLSv1.2 and earlier. (Note that run_pfs() only checks for TLSv1.2 or earlier if the $EXPERIMENTAL flag is set to true.) First, it removes the test to see if the server will reject a ClientHello that only specifies TLS_DHE cipher suites if it includes a supported_groups extension that only specifies an unrecognized DH group. Instead, if the server supports TLS_DHE cipher suites (at TLSv1.2 or earlier) and the $EXPERIMENTAL flag is true, it will try to find out what group(s) the server uses. Second, it will report the group(s) found even if the server uses a group that does not come from RFC 7919.
The result is that if the server supports selecting groups from the supported_groups extension, it will print all of the groups that the server supports. If the server ignores the supported_groups extension and always uses the same group, it will print essentially the same information as is already printed by run_logjam().
One discrepancy, however, is that this code use pr_dh_quality() to determine how good a DH group is, based on the length of the prime, and pr_dh_quality() has differs from run_logjam() in terms of how it rates groups based on the lengths of their primes.
There are a couple of old SSLv2 ciphers which haben't been included in
etc/cipher-mapping.txt . This PR updates the file. Names were derived
from the (old) OpenSSL / SSLeay source code.
In addition TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL (>=SSLv3 cipher) was added.
ToDo: Review functions to be updated to use those ciphers.
Some SSLv2 ciphers were missing (see openssl/ssl/ssl2.h and
SSLeay (ssl.h + ssl_lib.c).
Also in this list security bit strength None were renamed to '0',
encryption None to Null.
.. otherwise we'll hit too soon the threshold: Logic: by specifying
a timeout a user indicates that there might be a problem.
Also fatal() now supports a hint which is printed in normal
text (to stderr)
Some Cyrus IMAD if configured with SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(context, "!TLSv1")
and similar respond with a plaintext 'a002 NO Starttls negotiation failed"
when a not-supported protocol is detected, see #1082.
This PR fixes this by detecting (also) this downgrade. As a precaution
It still issues a warning as this is seems a special configuration.
Looking @ pending #1114 two improvements were done:
1) Keep the status of DH group detected (<name> or "Unknown DH group")
as well as the bit length
2) move the detection to a separate function get_common_prime()
There's still room for improvements when run_pfs() will take
over a part.
Also double code (my bad) from run_logjam() was move to a separate function.
As #1146 noted some installations miss hexdump. Better practice
is to check before what's needed albeit the error message when
a binary is missing does give the user a hint.
Currently the client simulation is based on the handshake data
from SSLlabs which is purely focussed on HTTP -- as SSLlabs does
HTTP only.
In #540 there was a PR addressing the fact that the data is not
what is claims to be -- the handshake of Android 7 seems to be
Chrome for Android and not Android itself.
This PR tries at least to modify the headline for client simulations.
This PR addresses the remaining TCP fragmentation by piping the line buffered
internal print through cat, see also #1130.
It extends 1b52834 which was the same doing for Linux and
OpenBSD.
This PR also consolidates the last remaining low level socket calls
in client_simulation_sockets() into socksend_clienthello().
An negative performance effect is barely measurable.
It also does a check whether the fd 5 is taken by a tty as
I see this while writing the commit message ;-). We might
want to make that line better instead of just echoing. :-)
At the beginning of run_server_preference(), if the attempt to connect to the server is unsuccessful, a message is printed listing all of the ciphers in $list_fwd and $tls13_list_fwd:
no matching cipher in this list found (pls report this): DES-CBC3-SHA:RC4-MD5:DES-CBC-SHA:RC4-SHA:AES128-SHA:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:ECDH-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDH-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384:AECDH-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
This message can be misleading. I tested a server that only supported TLSv1.3 using the provided OpenSSL 1.0.2-chacha. The server supported TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, but OpenSSL didn't. However, the message implies that the server does not support TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384.
This PR changes the message (and the one included in CSV/JSON output) to only list those ciphers in $list_fwd and $tls13_list_fwd that are actually supported by $OPENSSL.
Note that even with this PR, some ciphers are listed that aren't really supported by $OPENSSL, since the `-s` option isn't used. But, that is #663.
David Cooper
Dirk
bitsofinfo
Michael Koch
David Cooper