Files
testssl.sh/t
Dirk f09f742ee3 fix gh action
Not sure why this has been triggered though.

 #   Failed test 'Check whether CSV output matches baseline file from testssl.sh'
 #   at t/61_diff_testsslsh.t line 57.
 #
 # %s
 # @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 #  "id","fqdn/ip","port","severity","finding","cve","cwe"
 # -"engine_problem","/","443","WARN","No engine or GOST support via engine with your ./bin/openssl.Linux.x86_64","",""
 #  "service","testssl.sh/81.169.166.184","443","INFO","HTTP","",""
 #  "pre_128cipher","testssl.sh/81.169.166.184","443","INFO","No 128 cipher limit bug","",""
 #  "SSLv2","testssl.sh/81.169.166.184","443","OK","not offered","",""
 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
 t/61_diff_testsslsh.t ..............
2025-05-05 20:11:12 +02:00
..
2025-05-05 20:11:12 +02:00
2024-10-14 17:11:55 +02:00
2021-09-04 12:39:03 +00:00
2021-09-04 12:39:03 +00:00
2024-10-14 17:11:55 +02:00
2025-01-27 16:36:42 +01:00
2025-01-27 20:08:11 +01:00
2024-10-14 17:11:55 +02:00
2024-10-14 17:15:43 +02:00
2025-01-27 16:33:58 +01:00
2025-01-27 16:37:04 +01:00

Naming scheme

  • 00-05: Does the bare testssl.sh work at all?
  • 10-29: Do scans work fine (client side)?
  • 30-39: Does reporting work?
  • 50-69: Are the results what I expect (server side)?

Please help to write CI tests! Documentation can be found here. You can consult the existing code here. Feel free to use 10_baseline_ipv4_http.t or 12_diff_opensslversions.t as a template. The latter is newer and code is cleaner.